3-D telestration

A teaching tool for robotic surgery

Mohamed R Ali, Jamie P. Loggins, William D. Fuller, Brian E. Miller, Christopher J. Hasser, Peter Mackinlay Yellowlees, Tamas J Vidovszky, Jason J. Rasmussen, Jonathan L Pierce

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Telestration is an important teaching tool in minimally invasive surgery (MIS). While robotic surgery offers the added benefit of three-dimensional (3-D) visualization, telestration technology does not currently exist for this modality. This project aimed to develop a video algorithm to accurately translate a mentor's two-dimensional (2-D) telestration into a 3-D telestration in the da Vinci visual field. Materials and Methods: A prototype 3-D telestration system was constructed to translate 2-D telestration from a mentor station into 3-D graphics for the trainee at the robotic console. This system uses fast image correlation algorithms to allow 2-D images to be placed over the same anatomic location in the two separate video channels of the stereoscopic robotic visualization system. Three subjects of varying surgical backgrounds, blinded to the mode of telestration (2-D vs. 3-D), were tested in the laboratory, using a simulated robotic task. Results: There were few technologic errors (2), only one of which resulted in a task error, in 99 total trials. Only the experienced MIS staff surgeon had a significantly faster task time in 2-D than in 3-D (P < 0.05). The MIS fellow recorded the fastest task times in 2-D and 3-D (P < 0.05). There were nine task errors, six of which were committed by the MIS fellow. The nonsurgeon trainee had the least number of errors but also had the slowest times. Conclusions: Robotic telestration in 3-D is feasible and does not negatively impact performance in laboratory tasks. We plan to refine the prototype and investigate its use in vivo.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)107-112
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2008

Fingerprint

Robotics
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Teaching
Mentors
Visual Fields
Technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

3-D telestration : A teaching tool for robotic surgery. / Ali, Mohamed R; Loggins, Jamie P.; Fuller, William D.; Miller, Brian E.; Hasser, Christopher J.; Yellowlees, Peter Mackinlay; Vidovszky, Tamas J; Rasmussen, Jason J.; Pierce, Jonathan L.

In: Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques, Vol. 18, No. 1, 01.02.2008, p. 107-112.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ali, Mohamed R ; Loggins, Jamie P. ; Fuller, William D. ; Miller, Brian E. ; Hasser, Christopher J. ; Yellowlees, Peter Mackinlay ; Vidovszky, Tamas J ; Rasmussen, Jason J. ; Pierce, Jonathan L. / 3-D telestration : A teaching tool for robotic surgery. In: Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques. 2008 ; Vol. 18, No. 1. pp. 107-112.
@article{6de210f3ab9c431e937739e6e99f86fc,
title = "3-D telestration: A teaching tool for robotic surgery",
abstract = "Background: Telestration is an important teaching tool in minimally invasive surgery (MIS). While robotic surgery offers the added benefit of three-dimensional (3-D) visualization, telestration technology does not currently exist for this modality. This project aimed to develop a video algorithm to accurately translate a mentor's two-dimensional (2-D) telestration into a 3-D telestration in the da Vinci visual field. Materials and Methods: A prototype 3-D telestration system was constructed to translate 2-D telestration from a mentor station into 3-D graphics for the trainee at the robotic console. This system uses fast image correlation algorithms to allow 2-D images to be placed over the same anatomic location in the two separate video channels of the stereoscopic robotic visualization system. Three subjects of varying surgical backgrounds, blinded to the mode of telestration (2-D vs. 3-D), were tested in the laboratory, using a simulated robotic task. Results: There were few technologic errors (2), only one of which resulted in a task error, in 99 total trials. Only the experienced MIS staff surgeon had a significantly faster task time in 2-D than in 3-D (P < 0.05). The MIS fellow recorded the fastest task times in 2-D and 3-D (P < 0.05). There were nine task errors, six of which were committed by the MIS fellow. The nonsurgeon trainee had the least number of errors but also had the slowest times. Conclusions: Robotic telestration in 3-D is feasible and does not negatively impact performance in laboratory tasks. We plan to refine the prototype and investigate its use in vivo.",
author = "Ali, {Mohamed R} and Loggins, {Jamie P.} and Fuller, {William D.} and Miller, {Brian E.} and Hasser, {Christopher J.} and Yellowlees, {Peter Mackinlay} and Vidovszky, {Tamas J} and Rasmussen, {Jason J.} and Pierce, {Jonathan L}",
year = "2008",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/lap.2007.0051",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "107--112",
journal = "Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques",
issn = "1092-6429",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 3-D telestration

T2 - A teaching tool for robotic surgery

AU - Ali, Mohamed R

AU - Loggins, Jamie P.

AU - Fuller, William D.

AU - Miller, Brian E.

AU - Hasser, Christopher J.

AU - Yellowlees, Peter Mackinlay

AU - Vidovszky, Tamas J

AU - Rasmussen, Jason J.

AU - Pierce, Jonathan L

PY - 2008/2/1

Y1 - 2008/2/1

N2 - Background: Telestration is an important teaching tool in minimally invasive surgery (MIS). While robotic surgery offers the added benefit of three-dimensional (3-D) visualization, telestration technology does not currently exist for this modality. This project aimed to develop a video algorithm to accurately translate a mentor's two-dimensional (2-D) telestration into a 3-D telestration in the da Vinci visual field. Materials and Methods: A prototype 3-D telestration system was constructed to translate 2-D telestration from a mentor station into 3-D graphics for the trainee at the robotic console. This system uses fast image correlation algorithms to allow 2-D images to be placed over the same anatomic location in the two separate video channels of the stereoscopic robotic visualization system. Three subjects of varying surgical backgrounds, blinded to the mode of telestration (2-D vs. 3-D), were tested in the laboratory, using a simulated robotic task. Results: There were few technologic errors (2), only one of which resulted in a task error, in 99 total trials. Only the experienced MIS staff surgeon had a significantly faster task time in 2-D than in 3-D (P < 0.05). The MIS fellow recorded the fastest task times in 2-D and 3-D (P < 0.05). There were nine task errors, six of which were committed by the MIS fellow. The nonsurgeon trainee had the least number of errors but also had the slowest times. Conclusions: Robotic telestration in 3-D is feasible and does not negatively impact performance in laboratory tasks. We plan to refine the prototype and investigate its use in vivo.

AB - Background: Telestration is an important teaching tool in minimally invasive surgery (MIS). While robotic surgery offers the added benefit of three-dimensional (3-D) visualization, telestration technology does not currently exist for this modality. This project aimed to develop a video algorithm to accurately translate a mentor's two-dimensional (2-D) telestration into a 3-D telestration in the da Vinci visual field. Materials and Methods: A prototype 3-D telestration system was constructed to translate 2-D telestration from a mentor station into 3-D graphics for the trainee at the robotic console. This system uses fast image correlation algorithms to allow 2-D images to be placed over the same anatomic location in the two separate video channels of the stereoscopic robotic visualization system. Three subjects of varying surgical backgrounds, blinded to the mode of telestration (2-D vs. 3-D), were tested in the laboratory, using a simulated robotic task. Results: There were few technologic errors (2), only one of which resulted in a task error, in 99 total trials. Only the experienced MIS staff surgeon had a significantly faster task time in 2-D than in 3-D (P < 0.05). The MIS fellow recorded the fastest task times in 2-D and 3-D (P < 0.05). There were nine task errors, six of which were committed by the MIS fellow. The nonsurgeon trainee had the least number of errors but also had the slowest times. Conclusions: Robotic telestration in 3-D is feasible and does not negatively impact performance in laboratory tasks. We plan to refine the prototype and investigate its use in vivo.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=39149139627&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=39149139627&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/lap.2007.0051

DO - 10.1089/lap.2007.0051

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 107

EP - 112

JO - Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques

JF - Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques

SN - 1092-6429

IS - 1

ER -