1,2-Epoxycycloalkanes: Substrates and inhibitors of microsomal and cytosolic epoxide hydrolases in mouse liver

Jacques Magdalou, Bruce D. Hammock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Six different 1,2-epoxycycloalkanes, whose rings were constituted of 5 to 12 carbon atoms, were tested as possible inhibitors of epoxide-metabolizing enzymes and substrates for the microsomal and cytosolic epoxide hydrolases (mEH, cEH) in mouse liver. The geometric configurations and the relative steric hindrances of these epoxides were estimated from their ease of hydrolysis in acidic conditions to the corresponding diols, their abilities to react with nitrobenzylpyridine, and the chemical shifts of the groups associated with the oxirane rings measured by proton and 13C-NMR. The cyclo-pentene, -hexene, -heptene, -octene and -decene oxides adopted mainly a cis-configuration. By contrast, cyclododecene oxide presented a trans-configuration. Steric hindrance increased with the size of the ring and was particularly strong when cyclooctene, -decene and -dodecene oxides were considered. With the exception of cyclohexene oxide, all the compounds were weak inhibitors of EH and glutathione S-transferase (GST) activities. Cyclohexene oxide exhibited a selective inhibition of the mEH with an I50 of 4.0 ·10-6M. As the size of the ring increased, inhibitory potency was gradually lost. The cEH and the GST activities were less sensitive to the inhibitory effects of these epoxides (I50, 1 mM or above). A marked difference between the substrate selectivities of mEH and cEH for these epoxides was observed. The mEH hydrated all of the cyclic epoxides, although some of them at a very low rate; the best substrate was the cycloheptene oxide (2.3 nmol/min/mg protein). On the other hand, cyclodecene oxide was a substrate of cEH, but no diol formation was detected when cyclopentene, -hexene and -dodecene oxides were incubated with cytosolic enzyme.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2717-2722
Number of pages6
JournalBiochemical Pharmacology
Volume37
Issue number14
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 15 1988

Fingerprint

Epoxide Hydrolases
Liver
Epoxy Compounds
Oxides
Substrates
Glutathione Transferase
Cyclopentanes
Ethylene Oxide
Chemical shift
Alkenes
Enzymes
Protons
Hydrolysis
Carbon
Nuclear magnetic resonance
Atoms
Proteins

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology

Cite this

1,2-Epoxycycloalkanes : Substrates and inhibitors of microsomal and cytosolic epoxide hydrolases in mouse liver. / Magdalou, Jacques; Hammock, Bruce D.

In: Biochemical Pharmacology, Vol. 37, No. 14, 15.07.1988, p. 2717-2722.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4f315c92dccb447a945c6063e3bce349,
title = "1,2-Epoxycycloalkanes: Substrates and inhibitors of microsomal and cytosolic epoxide hydrolases in mouse liver",
abstract = "Six different 1,2-epoxycycloalkanes, whose rings were constituted of 5 to 12 carbon atoms, were tested as possible inhibitors of epoxide-metabolizing enzymes and substrates for the microsomal and cytosolic epoxide hydrolases (mEH, cEH) in mouse liver. The geometric configurations and the relative steric hindrances of these epoxides were estimated from their ease of hydrolysis in acidic conditions to the corresponding diols, their abilities to react with nitrobenzylpyridine, and the chemical shifts of the groups associated with the oxirane rings measured by proton and 13C-NMR. The cyclo-pentene, -hexene, -heptene, -octene and -decene oxides adopted mainly a cis-configuration. By contrast, cyclododecene oxide presented a trans-configuration. Steric hindrance increased with the size of the ring and was particularly strong when cyclooctene, -decene and -dodecene oxides were considered. With the exception of cyclohexene oxide, all the compounds were weak inhibitors of EH and glutathione S-transferase (GST) activities. Cyclohexene oxide exhibited a selective inhibition of the mEH with an I50 of 4.0 ·10-6M. As the size of the ring increased, inhibitory potency was gradually lost. The cEH and the GST activities were less sensitive to the inhibitory effects of these epoxides (I50, 1 mM or above). A marked difference between the substrate selectivities of mEH and cEH for these epoxides was observed. The mEH hydrated all of the cyclic epoxides, although some of them at a very low rate; the best substrate was the cycloheptene oxide (2.3 nmol/min/mg protein). On the other hand, cyclodecene oxide was a substrate of cEH, but no diol formation was detected when cyclopentene, -hexene and -dodecene oxides were incubated with cytosolic enzyme.",
author = "Jacques Magdalou and Hammock, {Bruce D.}",
year = "1988",
month = "7",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/0006-2952(88)90033-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "2717--2722",
journal = "Biochemical Pharmacology",
issn = "0006-2952",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "14",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 1,2-Epoxycycloalkanes

T2 - Substrates and inhibitors of microsomal and cytosolic epoxide hydrolases in mouse liver

AU - Magdalou, Jacques

AU - Hammock, Bruce D.

PY - 1988/7/15

Y1 - 1988/7/15

N2 - Six different 1,2-epoxycycloalkanes, whose rings were constituted of 5 to 12 carbon atoms, were tested as possible inhibitors of epoxide-metabolizing enzymes and substrates for the microsomal and cytosolic epoxide hydrolases (mEH, cEH) in mouse liver. The geometric configurations and the relative steric hindrances of these epoxides were estimated from their ease of hydrolysis in acidic conditions to the corresponding diols, their abilities to react with nitrobenzylpyridine, and the chemical shifts of the groups associated with the oxirane rings measured by proton and 13C-NMR. The cyclo-pentene, -hexene, -heptene, -octene and -decene oxides adopted mainly a cis-configuration. By contrast, cyclododecene oxide presented a trans-configuration. Steric hindrance increased with the size of the ring and was particularly strong when cyclooctene, -decene and -dodecene oxides were considered. With the exception of cyclohexene oxide, all the compounds were weak inhibitors of EH and glutathione S-transferase (GST) activities. Cyclohexene oxide exhibited a selective inhibition of the mEH with an I50 of 4.0 ·10-6M. As the size of the ring increased, inhibitory potency was gradually lost. The cEH and the GST activities were less sensitive to the inhibitory effects of these epoxides (I50, 1 mM or above). A marked difference between the substrate selectivities of mEH and cEH for these epoxides was observed. The mEH hydrated all of the cyclic epoxides, although some of them at a very low rate; the best substrate was the cycloheptene oxide (2.3 nmol/min/mg protein). On the other hand, cyclodecene oxide was a substrate of cEH, but no diol formation was detected when cyclopentene, -hexene and -dodecene oxides were incubated with cytosolic enzyme.

AB - Six different 1,2-epoxycycloalkanes, whose rings were constituted of 5 to 12 carbon atoms, were tested as possible inhibitors of epoxide-metabolizing enzymes and substrates for the microsomal and cytosolic epoxide hydrolases (mEH, cEH) in mouse liver. The geometric configurations and the relative steric hindrances of these epoxides were estimated from their ease of hydrolysis in acidic conditions to the corresponding diols, their abilities to react with nitrobenzylpyridine, and the chemical shifts of the groups associated with the oxirane rings measured by proton and 13C-NMR. The cyclo-pentene, -hexene, -heptene, -octene and -decene oxides adopted mainly a cis-configuration. By contrast, cyclododecene oxide presented a trans-configuration. Steric hindrance increased with the size of the ring and was particularly strong when cyclooctene, -decene and -dodecene oxides were considered. With the exception of cyclohexene oxide, all the compounds were weak inhibitors of EH and glutathione S-transferase (GST) activities. Cyclohexene oxide exhibited a selective inhibition of the mEH with an I50 of 4.0 ·10-6M. As the size of the ring increased, inhibitory potency was gradually lost. The cEH and the GST activities were less sensitive to the inhibitory effects of these epoxides (I50, 1 mM or above). A marked difference between the substrate selectivities of mEH and cEH for these epoxides was observed. The mEH hydrated all of the cyclic epoxides, although some of them at a very low rate; the best substrate was the cycloheptene oxide (2.3 nmol/min/mg protein). On the other hand, cyclodecene oxide was a substrate of cEH, but no diol formation was detected when cyclopentene, -hexene and -dodecene oxides were incubated with cytosolic enzyme.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023896579&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023896579&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0006-2952(88)90033-0

DO - 10.1016/0006-2952(88)90033-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 3395352

AN - SCOPUS:0023896579

VL - 37

SP - 2717

EP - 2722

JO - Biochemical Pharmacology

JF - Biochemical Pharmacology

SN - 0006-2952

IS - 14

ER -